Timwi (timwi) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Timwi
timwi
lj_userdoc

FAQ Translation Severities

I have noticed that recent changes in the LiveJournal FAQ were accompanied by insufficient notification for translators.

I believe when FAQs are edited, the respective editor has the option what level to notify translators at. There are four severity levels.

There have been changes -- for example, in FAQ #118 a number "700,000" was changed to "750,000" -- where translators were not notified at all. This should not happen. These minor changes are what Severity 1 is for.

There have also been rather major changes such as the addition of a complete sentence which adds extra information to the FAQs, which were only accompanied by a "Severity 1" setting. I believe that is not sufficient. New sentences change the content of the FAQ, therefore Severity 2 should be applied.

I suppose an entirely new (or entirely deleted) paragraph would be Severity 3, and a complete rewrite or change of an FAQ (such as that of FAQ #137 recently) should have Severity 4.

I would therefore like to ask FAQ editors to apply stronger Severities in the future in order to make it easier for translators to spot where priorities should be set.
Subscribe

  • New FAQ: How do I deal with spam?

    This FAQ is meant to tie together all of our spam-related information, currently spread over several different categories. Ideally, I'd like to have…

  • updating FAQ 160

    I am surely beating a dead horse, but FAQ 160 is out of date and has been so for awhile. For one, we don't support IE7, says FAQ 324, so those…

  • Updating FAQ160

    FAQ 160 could use instructions for clearing the cache for the following browsers: Internet Explorer 9 Firefox 5 (both Mac OS and Windows) Would…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 10 comments

  • New FAQ: How do I deal with spam?

    This FAQ is meant to tie together all of our spam-related information, currently spread over several different categories. Ideally, I'd like to have…

  • updating FAQ 160

    I am surely beating a dead horse, but FAQ 160 is out of date and has been so for awhile. For one, we don't support IE7, says FAQ 324, so those…

  • Updating FAQ160

    FAQ 160 could use instructions for clearing the cache for the following browsers: Internet Explorer 9 Firefox 5 (both Mac OS and Windows) Would…