on a technicality, rationality resists (calliste) wrote in lj_userdoc,
on a technicality, rationality resists
calliste
lj_userdoc

faq 139

I'm just looking at FAQ #139 ("Is adding someone to my Friends list against the Terms of Service?") and really don't like this wording:

If you have been added to the Friends list of someone else, LiveJournal offers tools to assist you in dealing with a harassing user (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=108) and also offers security options (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqcat=security). Therefore, LiveJournal will not take action against users for adding someone to their Friends list.

The "if you have been added to the friends list of someone else" part seems to be new. It sounds extremely awkward though because it implies to me that you can automatically contact lj_abuse whenever somebody else adds you to their friends list. Why not take it out again?

LiveJournal offers tools to assist you in dealing with a harassing user (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=108) and also offers security options (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqcat=security). Therefore, LiveJournal will not take action against users for adding someone to their Friends list.

Sounds better to me. Or is there a flaw in my logic?
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 3 comments