Spug (spug) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Spug
spug
lj_userdoc

FAQ 93 question

In FAQ #93: "Please note that the community should not be an official LiveJournal community."

Huh? What's meant by that? Is it directed at maintainers of official LiveJournal communities, telling them not to delete them? Shouldn't such maintainers already be ridiculously aware of the fact that they shouldn't delete official LiveJournal communities? If that's what's meant... Does it really need to be there? The sentence was very abrupt and seems unnecessary.

On a sidenote... Shouldn't #16 link to #93 in its "further reading" section?
Subscribe

  • no further reading

    FAQ250 has a section named Further Reading. The only thing in that section, the link "FAQ category: Customization in the Old Style System" goes to…

  • 12 title change

    Changed the title of 12 to append "(S1)" after it came up in a search with its title identical to 282 and I had a moment of horrified bafflement.…

  • FAQ 168: Recommending S1?

    S1 is deprecated, but FAQ 168 still suggests that certain categories of users should use it to customize their journal. Do we really want to be…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 15 comments

  • no further reading

    FAQ250 has a section named Further Reading. The only thing in that section, the link "FAQ category: Customization in the Old Style System" goes to…

  • 12 title change

    Changed the title of 12 to append "(S1)" after it came up in a search with its title identical to 282 and I had a moment of horrified bafflement.…

  • FAQ 168: Recommending S1?

    S1 is deprecated, but FAQ 168 still suggests that certain categories of users should use it to customize their journal. Do we really want to be…