Walking Ambivalence (ex_deadmanta171) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Walking Ambivalence
ex_deadmanta171
lj_userdoc

FAQ 196

Can FAQ 196 be changed in the middle paragraph, to say
If your community only contains occasional sexually explicit or adult material, such as the occasional nude photograph in a photography community, it is generally not necessary to restrict membership. However, these entries should be placed behind a lj-cut tag (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=75) and clearly contain a warning that they should not be viewed by minors.


instead of
If your community only contains occasional sexually explicit or adult material, such as the occasional nude photograph in a photography community, it is generally not necessary to restrict membership. However, these entries should be placed behind a lj-cut tag [ http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=75 ] and clearly contain a warning that they should not be viewed by minors.


This is just a small change, but changing the [] to () keeps the FAQ consistent.
Tags: faq196, status-rejected
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 7 comments