Abe Hassan (burr86) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Abe Hassan
burr86
lj_userdoc

FAQ75

Someone brought up the point that this FAQ is a pit; I agree with them pretty much 100%

* Change it to deal *just* with lj-cut
* Move lj user into the "How do I link" FAQ (FAQ 67)
* Nuke lj-poll because that's there just for "completeness" even though we have a poll FAQ
* Move lj-raw into the auto-format FAQ (FAQ 26)
* URL forms, disabling lj-cut ... do these really need to be documented in the FAQ? Does anyone actually ever ask about them? Not really -- let's move them to howto


... How does this sound?
Tags: cat-entries, faq26, faq67, faq75, status-resolved
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 35 comments