Constance - Make tea, not war (camomiletea) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Constance - Make tea, not war

FAQ 114

rebelsheart pointed out for me that the FAQ 114 is misleading/wrong, in this sentence:

Paid or Plus account users who are using a public style that is not available to Basic Accounts can continue to use that style, but will not be able to edit it.

Chnaging colors, and such can be construed as editing; and this can be done through Custom Options, even if the account is expired. As long as the user doesn't switch to another layout, they can keep using it and they can modify it via Custom Options. This is also true of the next sentence. The users would not be able to create custom layers and edit those custom layers, but they will be able to modify the look via Custom Options.

And I just looked at another sentence there

Paid journals will also revert from the custom EntryPage and ReplyPage layouts back to system defaults.

Should the EntryPage/ReplyPage be clarified? These are code terms for the pages, but people may not undertsnad them, unless they have experience editing the code. "Customized comment pages will revert to system defaults", or something like that.
Tags: cat-levels, faq114, status-resolved

  • Update to FAQ 248

    I updated the "warning bar" at the top of FAQ 248 to reflect the fact that, although the FAQ is in the "Advanced Customizations" category, only…

  • embedding journal

    FAQ68 I think in the sentence "Most methods of embedding your website require that you know your style's identification number" - your website…

  • Account Types

    FAQ38 does not include a mention of Sponsored Accounts.

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded