Fairly Unbalanced (opal1159) wrote in lj_userdoc,
Fairly Unbalanced

clarification for FAQ 137/155

There was some question in a recent Support request about the "After two weeks on LiveJournal, syndicated entries are deleted" wording in http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=137&view=full. Would it be reasonable to change this to "subject to deletion" or similar? Two-week-old entries in syndicated accounts are only "noticed" and deleted when a change in the feed triggers the account to update, so if a feed doesn't update for a long time, whatever is in the account could sit there for a while.

(FAQ 155 is similar but has two mentions in the second paragraph, so it might be too clunky to try to word it to fit both cases, "frequent" vs. "infrequent" updating.)
Tags: cat-syn, faq137, faq155, status-resolved

  • FAQ232

    There is a typo (or two) in FAQ232. I'm talking about the following sentence: Ddd them to your Friends list them with the Add Friend button at…

  • New FAQ: How do I deal with spam?

    This FAQ is meant to tie together all of our spam-related information, currently spread over several different categories. Ideally, I'd like to have…

  • Identity Account FAQs

    As LiveJournal Support regularly uses the term identity accounts both in answers to users and amongst themselves, and some system pages refer to…

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded