ファビュラス マックス (jai_dit) wrote in lj_userdoc,
ファビュラス マックス
jai_dit
lj_userdoc

Way back when 259 was added three years ago, it began its life as an image placeholders FAQ, but then morphed into an Unusual Connections FAQ that includes three disparate issues: mobile connections (small screen size and maybe low bandwidth), dial-up connections (low bandwidth only), and accessibility (a whole bunch of different things that may or may not include the previous issues). The resulting FAQ is a chimera; it's long and confusing, and at least for me often heads into tl;dr territory.

The summary of this FAQ gives three bullet points that provide natural division points: "reduce screen size for your mobile device", "reduce bandwidth or download time while browsing LiveJournal on a metered or dial-up connection", "increase accessibility when browsing LiveJournal with a screenreader." Thoughts on splitting this up into three FAQs? Some information will be duplicated, but since it will be so that we can approach it from a different context (and these are three completely different use cases that aren't likely to overlap very much) I think the duplication is worth it.
Tags: cat-features, cat-mobile, faq259, faqadd, status-pending
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 7 comments